Code
Plex
Open Source Community
Register
|
Sign In
|
CodePlex Home
Home
Downloads
Documentation
Issue Tracker
Source Code
People
License
Close
RSS
All Project Updates
Issue Tracker
Releases
Reviews
Source Code
Wiki & Documentation
RSS
By clicking Delete, all history, comments and attachments for this page will be deleted and cannot be restored.
Show Page Comments
|
Print View
|
Page Info
|
Change History (all pages)
Documentation
AutoMapper has moved to GitHub
AutoMapper has completely moved to GitHub:
https://github.com/AutoMapper/AutoMapper
The site can be found at
http://automapper.org
All issues should be reported on GitHub. No issues will be responded to on CodePlex.
I can't turn anything off on CodePlex without deleting the whole site, which would be very confusing.
Documentation is on the wiki:
https://github.com/AutoMapper/AutoMapper/wiki
Last edited
Sep 2 2011 at 11:44 PM
by
jbogard
, version 4
Comments
TdeRoo
Sep 1 2011 at 5:21 AM
Somehow the subjects on this page are not hyperlinks, only the first item is. This makes it hard to read the documentation which is there.
jbogard
Sep 2 2010 at 1:14 PM
@Gerhard
Can you post this question on the mailing list, or on Stack Overflow? It's a good question, I just want to make sure that the answer can be found by others easily.
GerhardKreuzer
Sep 2 2010 at 11:33 AM
What's about lazy loading? If I use a ORM handling database traffic (like OpenAccess from Telerik) I have full support for lazy loading. Now I want to map such an object to a new object, which is build up to handle GUI-tasks. Do I loose the lazy loading option? Whats about the situation, my original object contains a very long list of something, which is put on screen very seldom? Now it's very simple by using the original object, but GUI and DB centric tasks get mixed up.
With Automapper or some tool like this, I will be able to seperate GUI and DB concerns, which is a good practice, but I really won't loose lazy loading. This would be a huge performance and memory usage drawback!!
Thanks for helping out and clearify that here.
JookyDFW
Jun 10 2010 at 10:00 PM
Any plans complete this documentation page? Or am I looking in the wrong place? Maybe provide a demo app like to blog app in the video that demonstartes the more advanced features like custom mapping.
jbogard
Mar 30 2010 at 11:43 PM
@tommck You can use the Mapper.Map(source, dest) overload that takes in the destination object.
tommck
Mar 30 2010 at 5:14 PM
Are there plans to handle bi-directional mapping? I was contemplating using this for mapping/flattening some data from a service and then sending the data back. There doesn't seem to be a way to auto-update the original objects
danthman
Feb 6 2010 at 9:58 PM
Here are two topics I'd like to see discussed in the documentation:
1. What is the difference between constructing, converting, formatting, resolving, and "mapping from"? The differences between some of these are quite subtle, and it can be difficult to determine which one to choose.
2. What is the difference between Ignore() and UseDestinationValue()?
Sign in to add a comment
System Requirements
Updating...
© 2006-2012 Microsoft
|
Get Help
|
Privacy Statement
|
Terms of Use
|
Code of Conduct
|
Advertise With Us
|
Version 2012.2.7.18398